About five years ago, the profound theoretical Creoles of populism, ideology and indigenous racist implications, raised as an official program of the Multinational State (which ignored the Nation) that Bolivia should convert to socialism on the basis of the original and should not pass the capitalist stage. Were given some measures, among others, launched a furious campaign against capitalism.
The theoretical foundation of this utopia, refuted more than a century by the theory and practice, proposed "building a new system of social organization based on the production and appropriation Community-universal "... " save now to the communal form wherever it has been preserved ", a task that would be" a monumental work of reconstructing the ancestral community "..." to overcome capitalist alienation "argument that , moreover, was adopted as the official ideology of the ruling group.
The aforementioned utopia, that is not going anywhere, was brought into effect about five years ago, but put into practice, ended in complete failure, because not met or minimum proportion, and more , as was possible to apply, all that emerged was social chaos, destruction of production activities and increased reliance of the country to foreign economies. Indeed, neither the indigenous communities have been able to develop towards socialism, nor has it been able to stop the development of capitalism, although it has produced huge losses wasteful measures that force the country to face serious difficulties. Moreover, the populist ideology has denied herself and left to become a new formula for solving the problems of Bolivia.
The attempt to apply that populism, which also turns more to the right than the left, occurred despite warnings to the contrary and subsequently identified by all kinds of media, ie left to failure knowingly and with knowledge of the facts. What's more, it was reiterated at the time that capitalist development in Bolivia was inevitable, though it hiciesen every effort to the contrary.
regard, and in 2003 a widely circulated pamphlet ("Practice and theory of the Constituent Assembly." CIMA. 2003) noted that "... the actual content of the historical process is entirely Bolivian national and democratic-capitalist" ... " than that and no other is the content of the movement Bolivian social one and nothing can stop, divert or take it to another target. And if this process can not be met now, or is stopped for some action, inevitably and inexorably will be reborn with the same features, but more acute than before, until its completion, because you can not indefinitely detain the clock of history " ... "This current historical-political process has absolutely nothing socialist about ..." and so on.
Over time, the facts have been commissioned to demonstrate the accuracy or inaccuracy of the political positions that were raised at that time and, therefore, the failed utopian theories should be replaced by those that have been successful in its application.
The theoretical foundation of this utopia, refuted more than a century by the theory and practice, proposed "building a new system of social organization based on the production and appropriation Community-universal "... " save now to the communal form wherever it has been preserved ", a task that would be" a monumental work of reconstructing the ancestral community "..." to overcome capitalist alienation "argument that , moreover, was adopted as the official ideology of the ruling group.
The aforementioned utopia, that is not going anywhere, was brought into effect about five years ago, but put into practice, ended in complete failure, because not met or minimum proportion, and more , as was possible to apply, all that emerged was social chaos, destruction of production activities and increased reliance of the country to foreign economies. Indeed, neither the indigenous communities have been able to develop towards socialism, nor has it been able to stop the development of capitalism, although it has produced huge losses wasteful measures that force the country to face serious difficulties. Moreover, the populist ideology has denied herself and left to become a new formula for solving the problems of Bolivia.
The attempt to apply that populism, which also turns more to the right than the left, occurred despite warnings to the contrary and subsequently identified by all kinds of media, ie left to failure knowingly and with knowledge of the facts. What's more, it was reiterated at the time that capitalist development in Bolivia was inevitable, though it hiciesen every effort to the contrary.
regard, and in 2003 a widely circulated pamphlet ("Practice and theory of the Constituent Assembly." CIMA. 2003) noted that "... the actual content of the historical process is entirely Bolivian national and democratic-capitalist" ... " than that and no other is the content of the movement Bolivian social one and nothing can stop, divert or take it to another target. And if this process can not be met now, or is stopped for some action, inevitably and inexorably will be reborn with the same features, but more acute than before, until its completion, because you can not indefinitely detain the clock of history " ... "This current historical-political process has absolutely nothing socialist about ..." and so on.
Over time, the facts have been commissioned to demonstrate the accuracy or inaccuracy of the political positions that were raised at that time and, therefore, the failed utopian theories should be replaced by those that have been successful in its application.
Source: Editorial El Diario
0 comments:
Post a Comment